Currently we enable CDR for every read command including
for tuning procedure which is not correct (as CDR if
enabled might correct the phase during tuning and we
wont be able to detect the correct phase during tuning).
So, disable CDR for read tuning commands.
CRs-fixed: 759398
Change-Id: I051b6e3b204dde22cdc973759c3e32d0a81c369a
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavan Anamula <pavana@codeaurora.org>
On error, the CMDQ engine stops processing requests. It is then
halted and error handled.
The error have been categorized as below:
1. Command error
a. time-out
- invalidate all pending tags & requeue
- reset both card & controller
b. crc
- end the error mrq
- tune
- unhalt
2. Data error
a. time-out
- invalidate all pending tags & requeue
- reset both card and controller
b. crc
- end the error mrq
- tune
- unhalt
3. RED error
This is device specific error and is not recoverable.
The card and controller are reset in this case and all
pending tags are invalidated and requeued.
Change-Id: I791d05f6b31d8f9b35a56fe85007b320c14e8b46
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>
[subhashj@codeaurora.org: fixed trivial merge conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
[xiaonian@codeaurora.org: fixed trivial merge conflicts and
fixed one compilation error]
Signed-off-by: Xiaonian Wang <xiaonian@codeaurora.org>
The eMMC 4.5 spec for RPMB accesses is not very clear on whether
user parition accesses can be allowed in the middle of RPMB accesses.
Due to this ambiguity, it turns out this is implementation defined
and certain cards support it while others do not.
In order to allow this feature to function across a wide variety of
cards, this patch takes the pessimistic approach and ensures that any
RPMB access is completed before user partition can be accessed.
Change-Id: I77959f462c874771a0a854d9a2bc48df446eff56
Signed-off-by: Krishna Konda <kkonda@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Oluwafemi Adeyemi <aadeyemi@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>
[merez@codeaurora: fix conflicts due to changes in 3.14]
Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@codeaurora.org>
[subhashj@codeaurora.org: fixed merge conflicts and fixed compilation
errors]
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
[xiaonian@codeaurora.org: fixed trivial merge conflicts and fixed
compilation errors]
Signed-off-by: Xiaonian Wang <xiaonian@codeaurora.org>
Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would be to
add an ioctl function for sending a sequence of commands to the device
atomically as proposed here. These multi commands are simple array of
the existing mmc_ioc_cmd structure.
The structure passed via the ioctl uses a __u64 type to specify the number
of commands (so that the structure is aligned on a 64-bit boundary) and a
zero length array as a header for list of commands to be issued. The
maximum number of commands that can be sent is determined by
MMC_IOC_MAX_CMDS (which defaults to 255 and should be more than
sufficient).
This based upon work by Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>.
Signed-off-by: Seshagiri Holi <sholi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
