commit 80ef08670d4c28a06a3de954bd350368780bcfef upstream.
A request could end up on the fpq->io list after fuse_abort_conn() has
reset fpq->connected and aborted requests on that list:
Thread-1 Thread-2
======== ========
->fuse_simple_request() ->shutdown
->__fuse_request_send()
->queue_request() ->fuse_abort_conn()
->fuse_dev_do_read() ->acquire(fpq->lock)
->wait_for(fpq->lock) ->set err to all req's in fpq->io
->release(fpq->lock)
->acquire(fpq->lock)
->add req to fpq->io
After the userspace copy is done the request will be ended, but
req->out.h.error will remain uninitialized. Also the copy might block
despite being already aborted.
Fix both issues by not allowing the request to be queued on the fpq->io
list after fuse_abort_conn() has processed this list.
Reported-by: Pradeep P V K <pragalla@codeaurora.org>
Fixes: fd22d62ed0 ("fuse: no fc->lock for iqueue parts")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 32f98877c57bee6bc27f443a96f49678a2cd6a50 ]
page_count() is unstable. Unless there has been an RCU grace period
between when the page was removed from the page cache and now, a
speculative reference may exist from the page cache.
Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2d84a2d19b6150c6dbac1e6ebad9c82e4c123772 upstream.
In current fuse_drop_waiting() implementation it's possible that
fuse_wait_aborted() will not be woken up in the unlikely case that
fuse_abort_conn() + fuse_wait_aborted() runs in between checking
fc->connected and calling atomic_dec(&fc->num_waiting).
Do the atomic_dec_and_test() unconditionally, which also provides the
necessary barrier against reordering with the fc->connected check.
The explicit smp_mb() in fuse_wait_aborted() is not actually needed, since
the spin_unlock() in fuse_abort_conn() provides the necessary RELEASE
barrier after resetting fc->connected. However, this is not a performance
sensitive path, and adding the explicit barrier makes it easier to
document.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Fixes: b8f95e5d13f5 ("fuse: umount should wait for all requests")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v4.19
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 15fab63e1e57be9fdb5eec1bbc5916e9825e9acb upstream.
Change pipe_buf_get() to return a bool indicating whether it succeeded
in raising the refcount of the page (if the thing in the pipe is a page).
This removes another mechanism for overflowing the page refcount. All
callers converted to handle a failure.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[ 4.4.y backport notes:
Regarding the change in generic_pipe_buf_get(), note that
page_cache_get() is the same as get_page(). See mainline commit
09cbfeaf1a5a6 "mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and
page_cache_{get,release} macros" for context. ]
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 7640682e67b33cab8628729afec8ca92b851394f ]
FUSE filesystem server and kernel client negotiate during initialization
phase, what should be the maximum write size the client will ever issue.
Correspondingly the filesystem server then queues sys_read calls to read
requests with buffer capacity large enough to carry request header + that
max_write bytes. A filesystem server is free to set its max_write in
anywhere in the range between [1*page, fc->max_pages*page]. In particular
go-fuse[2] sets max_write by default as 64K, wheres default fc->max_pages
corresponds to 128K. Libfuse also allows users to configure max_write, but
by default presets it to possible maximum.
If max_write is < fc->max_pages*page, and in NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler we
allow to retrieve more than max_write bytes, corresponding prepared
NOTIFY_REPLY will be thrown away by fuse_dev_do_read, because the
filesystem server, in full correspondence with server/client contract, will
be only queuing sys_read with ~max_write buffer capacity, and
fuse_dev_do_read throws away requests that cannot fit into server request
buffer. In turn the filesystem server could get stuck waiting indefinitely
for NOTIFY_REPLY since NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler returned OK which is
understood by clients as that NOTIFY_REPLY was queued and will be sent
back.
Cap requested size to negotiate max_write to avoid the problem. This
aligns with the way NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler works, which already
unconditionally caps requested retrieve size to fuse_conn->max_pages. This
way it should not hurt NOTIFY_RETRIEVE semantic if we return less data than
was originally requested.
Please see [1] for context where the problem of stuck filesystem was hit
for real, how the situation was traced and for more involving patch that
did not make it into the tree.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=155057023600853&w=2
[2] https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Cc: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 9509941e9c534920ccc4771ae70bd6cbbe79df1c upstream.
Some of the pipe_buf_release() handlers seem to assume that the pipe is
locked - in particular, anon_pipe_buf_release() accesses pipe->tmp_page
without taking any extra locks. From a glance through the callers of
pipe_buf_release(), it looks like FUSE is the only one that calls
pipe_buf_release() without having the pipe locked.
This bug should only lead to a memory leak, nothing terrible.
Fixes: dd3bb14f44 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7fabaf303458fcabb694999d6fa772cc13d4e217 upstream.
fuse_request_send_notify_reply() may fail if the connection was reset for
some reason (e.g. fs was unmounted). Don't leak request reference in this
case. Besides leaking memory, this resulted in fc->num_waiting not being
decremented and hence fuse_wait_aborted() left in a hanging and unkillable
state.
Fixes: 2d45ba381a ("fuse: add retrieve request")
Fixes: b8f95e5d13f5 ("fuse: umount should wait for all requests")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+6339eda9cb4ebbc4c37b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v2.6.36
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 908a572b80f6e9577b45e81b3dfe2e22111286b8 upstream.
Using waitqueue_active() is racy. Make sure we issue a wake_up()
unconditionally after storing into fc->blocked. After that it's okay to
optimize with waitqueue_active() since the first wake up provides the
necessary barrier for all waiters, not the just the woken one.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Fixes: 3c18ef8117 ("fuse: optimize wake_up")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.10
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit b8f95e5d13f5f0191dcb4b9113113d241636e7cb upstream.
fuse_abort_conn() does not guarantee that all async requests have actually
finished aborting (i.e. their ->end() function is called). This could
actually result in still used inodes after umount.
Add a helper to wait until all requests are fully done. This is done by
looking at the "num_waiting" counter. When this counter drops to zero, we
can be sure that no more requests are outstanding.
Fixes: 0d8e84b043 ("fuse: simplify request abort")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 45ff350bbd9d0f0977ff270a0d427c71520c0c37 upstream.
fuse_dev_release() assumes that it's the only one referencing the
fpq->processing list, but that's not true, since fuse_abort_conn() can be
doing the same without any serialization between the two.
Fixes: c3696046be ("fuse: separate pqueue for clones")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 87114373ea507895a62afb10d2910bd9adac35a8 upstream.
Refcounting of request is broken when fuse_abort_conn() is called and
request is on the fpq->io list:
- ref is taken too late
- then it is not dropped
Fixes: 0d8e84b043 ("fuse: simplify request abort")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit a2477b0e67c52f4364a47c3ad70902bc2a61bd4c upstream.
fuse_dev_splice_write() reads pipe->buffers to determine the size of
'bufs' array before taking the pipe_lock(). This is not safe as
another thread might change the 'pipe->buffers' between the allocation
and taking the pipe_lock(). So we end up with too small 'bufs' array.
Move the bufs allocations inside pipe_lock()/pipe_unlock() to fix this.
Fixes: dd3bb14f44 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v2.6.35
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 6ba4d2722d06960102c981322035239cd66f7316 upstream.
There is a potential race between fuse_dev_do_write()
and request_wait_answer() contexts as shown below:
TASK 1:
__fuse_request_send():
|--spin_lock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--queue_request();
|--spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--request_wait_answer():
|--if (test_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags))
<gets pre-empted after it is validated true>
TASK 2:
fuse_dev_do_write():
|--clears bit FR_SENT,
|--request_end():
|--sets bit FR_FINISHED
|--spin_lock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--list_del_init(&req->intr_entry);
|--spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--fuse_put_request();
|--queue_interrupt();
<request gets queued to interrupts list>
|--wake_up_locked(&fiq->waitq);
|--wait_event_freezable();
<as FR_FINISHED is set, it returns and then
the caller frees this request>
Now, the next fuse_dev_do_read(), see interrupts list is not empty
and then calls fuse_read_interrupt() which tries to access the request
which is already free'd and gets the below crash:
[11432.401266] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
...
[11432.418518] Kernel BUG at ffffff80083720e0
[11432.456168] PC is at __list_del_entry+0x6c/0xc4
[11432.463573] LR is at fuse_dev_do_read+0x1ac/0x474
...
[11432.679999] [<ffffff80083720e0>] __list_del_entry+0x6c/0xc4
[11432.687794] [<ffffff80082c65e0>] fuse_dev_do_read+0x1ac/0x474
[11432.693180] [<ffffff80082c6b14>] fuse_dev_read+0x6c/0x78
[11432.699082] [<ffffff80081d5638>] __vfs_read+0xc0/0xe8
[11432.704459] [<ffffff80081d5efc>] vfs_read+0x90/0x108
[11432.709406] [<ffffff80081d67f0>] SyS_read+0x58/0x94
As FR_FINISHED bit is set before deleting the intr_entry with input
queue lock in request completion path, do the testing of this flag and
queueing atomically with the same lock in queue_interrupt().
Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Fixes: fd22d62ed0 ("fuse: no fc->lock for iqueue parts")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit a8a86d78d673b1c99fe9b0064739fde9e9774184 upstream.
fuse_abort_conn() moves requests from pending list to a temporary list
before canceling them. This operation races with request_wait_answer()
which also tries to remove the request after it gets a fatal signal. It
checks FR_PENDING flag to determine whether the request is still in the
pending list.
Make fuse_abort_conn() clear FR_PENDING flag so that request_wait_answer()
does not remove the request from temporary list.
This bug causes an Oops when trying to delete an already deleted list entry
in end_requests().
Fixes: ee314a870e ("fuse: abort: no fc->lock needed for request ending")
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fuse_dev_ioctl() performed fuse_get_dev() on a user-supplied fd,
leading to a type confusion issue. Fix it by checking file->f_op.
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Make each fuse device clone refer to a separate processing queue. The only
constraint on userspace code is that the request answer must be written to
the same device clone as it was read off.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Allow fuse device clones to refer to be distinguished. This patch just
adds the infrastructure by associating a separate "struct fuse_dev" with
each clone.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
Allow an open fuse device to be "cloned". Userspace can create a clone by:
newfd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR)
ioctl(newfd, FUSE_DEV_IOC_CLONE, &oldfd);
At this point newfd will refer to the same fuse connection as oldfd.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
In fuse_abort_conn() when all requests are on private lists we no longer
need fc->lock protection.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
No longer need to call request_end() with the connection lock held. We
still protect the background counters and queue with fc->lock, so acquire
it if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
Now that we atomically test having already done everything we no longer
need other protection.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
When the connection is aborted it is possible that request_end() will be
called twice. Use atomic test and set to do the actual ending only once.
test_and_set_bit() also provides the necessary barrier semantics so no
explicit smp_wmb() is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
When an unlocked request is aborted, it is moved from fpq->io to a private
list. Then, after unlocking fpq->lock, the private list is processed and
the requests are finished off.
To protect the private list, we need to mark the request with a flag, so if
in the meantime the request is unlocked the list is not corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
Add a fpq->lock for protecting members of struct fuse_pqueue and FR_LOCKED
request flag.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
- locked list_add() + list_del_init() cancel out
- common handling of case when request is ended here in the read phase
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
This will allow checking ->connected just with the processing queue lock.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
This is just two fields: fc->io and fc->processing.
This patch just rearranges the fields, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
wait_event_interruptible_exclusive_locked() will do everything
request_wait() does, so replace it.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
Interrupt is only queued after the request has been sent to userspace.
This is either done in request_wait_answer() or fuse_dev_do_read()
depending on which state the request is in at the time of the interrupt.
If it's not yet sent, then queuing the interrupt is postponed until the
request is read. Otherwise (the request has already been read and is
waiting for an answer) the interrupt is queued immedidately.
We want to call queue_interrupt() without fc->lock protection, in which
case there can be a race between the two functions:
- neither of them queue the interrupt (thinking the other one has already
done it).
- both of them queue the interrupt
The first one is prevented by adding memory barriers, the second is
prevented by checking (under fiq->waitq.lock) if the interrupt has already
been queued.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Use fiq->waitq.lock for protecting members of struct fuse_iqueue and
FR_PENDING request flag, previously protected by fc->lock.
Following patches will remove fc->lock protection from these members.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
This will allow checking ->connected just with the input queue lock.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
The input queue contains normal requests (fc->pending), forgets
(fc->forget_*) and interrupts (fc->interrupts). There's also fc->waitq and
fc->fasync for waking up the readers of the fuse device when a request is
available.
The fc->reqctr is also moved to the input queue (assigned to the request
when the request is added to the input queue.
This patch just rearranges the fields, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
Use flags for representing the state in fuse_req. This is needed since
req->list will be protected by different locks in different states, hence
we'll want the state itself to be split into distinct bits, each protected
with the relevant lock in that state.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
FUSE_REQ_INIT is actually the same state as FUSE_REQ_PENDING and
FUSE_REQ_READING and FUSE_REQ_WRITING can be merged into a common
FUSE_REQ_IO state.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
Only hold fc->lock over sections of request_wait_answer() that actually
need it. If wait_event_interruptible() returns zero, it means that the
request finished. Need to add memory barriers, though, to make sure that
all relevant data in the request is synchronized.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Since it's a 64bit counter, it's never gonna wrap around. Remove code
dealing with that possibility.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
Splice fc->pending and fc->processing lists into a common kill list while
holding fc->lock.
By the time we release fc->lock, pending and processing lists are empty and
the io list contains only locked requests.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
