SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS can be passed to sched_setattr to specify that
the call must not touch scheduling parameters (nice or priority). This
is particularly handy for uclamp when used in conjunction with
SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY as that allows to issue a syscall that only
impacts uclamp values.
However, sched_setattr always checks whether the priorities and nice
values passed in sched_attr are valid first, even if those never get
used down the line. This is useless at best since userspace can
trivially bypass this check to set the uclamp values by specifying low
priorities. However, it is cumbersome to do so as there is no single
expression of this that skips both RT and CFS checks at once. As such,
userspace needs to query the task policy first with e.g. sched_getattr
and then set sched_attr.sched_priority accordingly. This is racy and
slower than a single call.
As the priority and nice checks are useless when SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS
is specified, simply inherit them in this case to match the policy
inheritance of SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY.
Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210805102154.590709-3-qperret@google.com
Bug: 190237315
(cherry picked from commit f4dddf9
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifdbc9262b82c7f5c0d34952ece07770a53e3f6a5
[panchajanya1999: adapt for k4.14]
Signed-off-by: Panchajanya1999 <panchajanya@azure-dev.live>
Signed-off-by: mcdofrenchfreis <xyzevan@androidist.net>
A more energy efficient update of the IO wait boosting mechanism has
been introduced in:
commit a5a0809 ("cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost more energy
efficient")
where the boost value is expected to be:
- doubled at each successive wakeup from IO
staring from the minimum frequency supported by a CPU
- reset when a CPU is not updated for more then one tick
by either disabling the IO wait boost or resetting its value to the
minimum frequency if this new update requires an IO boost.
This approach is supposed to "ignore" boosting for sporadic wakeups from
IO, while still getting the frequency boosted to the maximum to benefit
long sequence of wakeup from IO operations.
However, these assumptions are not always satisfied.
For example, when an IO boosted CPU enters idle for more the one tick
and then wakes up after an IO wait, since in sugov_set_iowait_boost() we
first check the IOWAIT flag, we keep doubling the iowait boost instead
of restarting from the minimum frequency value.
This misbehavior could happen mainly on non-shared frequency domains,
thus defeating the energy efficiency optimization, but it can also
happen on shared frequency domain systems.
Let fix this issue in sugov_set_iowait_boost() by:
- first check the IO wait boost reset conditions
to eventually reset the boost value
- then applying the correct IO boost value
if required by the caller
Fixes: a5a0809 (cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost more energy
efficient)
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit b89997aa88f0b07d8a6414c908af75062103b8c9 ]
Being called for each dequeue, util_est reduces the number of its updates
by filtering out when the EWMA signal is different from the task util_avg
by less than 1%. It is a problem for a sudden util_avg ramp-up. Due to the
decay from a previous high util_avg, EWMA might now be close enough to
the new util_avg. No update would then happen while it would leave
ue.enqueued with an out-of-date value.
Taking into consideration the two util_est members, EWMA and enqueued for
the filtering, ensures, for both, an up-to-date value.
This is for now an issue only for the trace probe that might return the
stale value. Functional-wise, it isn't a problem, as the value is always
accessed through max(enqueued, ewma).
This problem has been observed using LISA's UtilConvergence:test_means on
the sd845c board.
No regression observed with Hackbench on sd845c and Perf-bench sched pipe
on hikey/hikey960.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210225165820.1377125-1-vincent.donnefort@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
While calculating untilization of CPU during task placement in fbt(),
current code doesn't take uclamp into account which would lead to
selection of incorrect CPU for the task when uclamp restrictions
are in place for the task.
Change-Id: I8371affe3b37733d222e5c57953e53f91fc19a53
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
Make use of the existing need_idle feature to incorporate upstream latency
sensitive tasks.
Change-Id: Ie1513187d024b93c8b619d9e0a35d84195488696
Signed-off-by: Shaleen Agrawal <shalagra@codeaurora.org>
DISCLAIMER:
=====================================================================
This patch is intended to go upstream after collecting feedback from
Android community that it resolves the issues reported by various
partners. It is not meant to be merged into android-mainline.
=====================================================================
uclamp_max effectiveness could be easily impacted by small transient
tasks that wake up frequency to do small work then go back to sleep.
If there's a busy task that is capped by uclamp_max to run at a smaller
frequency, due to max-aggregation rule tasks that wake up on the same
cpu will increase the rq->uclamp_max value if they were higher than the
capped task. Given that all tasks by default have a uclamp_max = 1024,
this is the likely case by default.
Note that since the capped task is likely to be a busy and throttled
one, its util, and hence the rq->util, will be very high and as soon as
we lift the capping the requested frequency will be very high.
To address this issue of increasing the resilience of uclamp_max against
these transient tasks that don't really need to run at a higher
frequency, we implement a simple filter mechanism to ignore uclamp_max
for those tasks.
The algorithm looks at the runtime of the task and compares it to
sched_slice(). By default we assume any task that its runtime is 1/4th
of sched_slice() or less is a small transient task that we can ignore
its uclamp_max requirement.
runtime < sched_slice() / divider
We can tweak the divider by
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_util_uclamp_max_filter_divider sysctl. It accepts
values 0-4.
divider = 1 << sched_util_uclamp_max_filter_divider
We add a new task_tick_uclamp() function to verify this condition
periodically and ensure the conditions checked at wake up are still true
- in case this transient task suddenly becomes a busy one.
For EAS, we can't use sched_slice() there to figure out if uclamp_max
will be ignored because the task is not enqueued yet. So we leave it
as-is to figure out the placement based on worst case scenario.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ie3afa93a7d70dab5b7c22e820cc078ffd0e891ef
[yaro: ported to msm-5.4 and remove sysctl parts for now]
Signed-off-by: Yaroslav Furman <yaro330@gmail.com>
task_fits_capacity() drives CPU selection at wakeup time, and is also used
to detect misfit tasks. Right now it does so by comparing task_util_est()
with a CPU's capacity, but doesn't take into account uclamp restrictions.
There's a few interesting uses that can come out of doing this. For
instance, a low uclamp.max value could prevent certain tasks from being
flagged as misfit tasks, so they could merrily remain on low-capacity CPUs.
Similarly, a high uclamp.min value would steer tasks towards high capacity
CPUs at wakeup (and, should that fail, later steered via misfit balancing),
so such "boosted" tasks would favor CPUs of higher capacity.
Introduce uclamp_task_util() and make task_fits_capacity() use it.
[QP: fixed missing dependency on fits_capacity() by using the open coded
alternative]
Bug: 120440300
Tested-By: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211113851.24241-5-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit a7008c07a568278ed2763436404752a98004c7ff)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Change-Id: Iabde2eda7252c3bcc273e61260a7a12a7de991b1
[ Upstream commit 6015b1aca1a233379625385feb01dd014aca60b5 ]
The getaffinity() system call uses 'cpumask_size()' to decide how big
the CPU mask is - so far so good. It is indeed the allocation size of a
cpumask.
But the code also assumes that the whole allocation is initialized
without actually doing so itself. That's wrong, because we might have
fixed-size allocations (making copying and clearing more efficient), but
not all of it is then necessarily used if 'nr_cpu_ids' is smaller.
Having checked other users of 'cpumask_size()', they all seem to be ok,
either using it purely for the allocation size, or explicitly zeroing
the cpumask before using the size in bytes to copy it.
See for example the ublk_ctrl_get_queue_affinity() function that uses
the proper 'zalloc_cpumask_var()' to make sure that the whole mask is
cleared, whether the storage is on the stack or if it was an external
allocation.
Fix this by just zeroing the allocation before using it. Do the same
for the compat version of sched_getaffinity(), which had the same logic.
Also, for consistency, make sched_getaffinity() use 'cpumask_bits()' to
access the bits. For a cpumask_var_t, it ends up being a pointer to the
same data either way, but it's just a good idea to treat it like you
would a 'cpumask_t'. The compat case already did that.
Reported-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7d026744-6bd6-6827-0471-b5e8eae0be3f@arm.com/
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit a53ce18cacb477dd0513c607f187d16f0fa96f71 upstream.
Commit 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed")
fixes an overflowing bug, but ignore a case that se->exec_start is reset
after a migration.
For fixing this case, we delay the reset of se->exec_start after
placing the entity which se->exec_start to detect long sleeping task.
In order to take into account a possible divergence between the clock_task
of 2 rqs, we increase the threshold to around 104 days.
Fixes: 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed")
Originally-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230317160810.107988-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 829c1651e9c4a6f78398d3e67651cef9bb6b42cc upstream.
When a scheduling entity is placed onto cfs_rq, its vruntime is pulled
to the base level (around cfs_rq->min_vruntime), so that the entity
doesn't gain extra boost when placed backwards.
However, if the entity being placed wasn't executed for a long time, its
vruntime may get too far behind (e.g. while cfs_rq was executing a
low-weight hog), which can inverse the vruntime comparison due to s64
overflow. This results in the entity being placed with its original
vruntime way forwards, so that it will effectively never get to the cpu.
To prevent that, ignore the vruntime of the entity being placed if it
didn't execute for much longer than the characteristic sheduler time
scale.
[rkagan: formatted, adjusted commit log, comments, cutoff value]
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230130122216.3555094-1-rkagan@amazon.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch addresses an issue seen where SCHED_FIFO prio 99
tasks were being woken up on a cpu where a long-running softirq
was executing, and the RT task was not being migrated, causing
long (10+ms wakeup latencies).
Prior to upstream commit 934fc3314b39 ("sched/cpupri: Remap
CPUPRI_NORMAL to MAX_RT_PRIO-1") the task->prio -> cpupri
mapping is a little ackward.
For RT tasks, its calculated as:
cpupri = MAX_RT_PRIO - prio + 1;
See:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/refs/heads/android13-5.10/kernel/sched/cpupri.c#39
This is added ontop of the also ackward detail that the
task->prio is inverted (RT prio99 -> 0), means the cpupri
mapping for RT tasks goes from 2->101. This makes it easy to
evaluate the cpupri incorrectly.
Which it turns out happened In commit 3adfd8e344ac ("ANDROID:
sched: avoid placing RT threads on cores handling softirqs"):
3adfd8e344%5E%21/
With the lines:
int task_pri = convert_prio(p->prio);
bool drop_nopreempts = task_pri <= MAX_RT_PRIO;
Where the added logic to decide to migrate a rt task off of a
cpu depended on this drop_nopreempts being true.
This works properly for rt tasks from prio 99 to 1, but for the
case of task->prio == 0 (userland rt prio 99 tasks) it breaks,
as the cpupri will be MAX_RT_PRIO - 0 + 1, which then gets
checked as <= MAX_RT_PRIO.
This prevents the cpu from being dropped from the scheduling
set and prevents the rt user prio 99 task from migrating, which
results in high priority rt tasks being left on cpus where long
running softirqs are executing, causing long latencies.
This patch fixes the off by one by changing the evaulation
to MAX_RT_PRIO + 1, so that user-prio 99 tasks will also be
migrated if appropriate.
Luckilly this odd cpupri mapping has been fixed upstream, making
this patch no longer necessary in 5.15 and newer kernels.
Fixes: 3adfd8e344ac ("ANDROID: sched: avoid placing RT threads on cores handling softirqs")
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia2db7cd461eb4c90f5850b791de1ae95582f7530
Load_balancer considers only cfs running tasks for finding busiest cpu
to do load balancing. But cpu may be busy with other type tasks (ex: RT),
then that cpu might not selected as busy cpu due to weight vs nr_run
checks fails). And possibley cfs tasks running on that cpu would suffer
till other type tasks finishes or weight checks passes, while other cpus
sitting idle and not able to do load balance.
So, consider all running tasks to check cpu busieness.
Change-Id: Iddf3f668507e20359f6388fc30ff5897d234c902
Signed-off-by: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: atndko <z1281552865@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cyber Knight <cyberknight755@gmail.com>
When a boosted task gets throttled, what normally happens is that it's
immediately enqueued again with ENQUEUE_REPLENISH, which replenishes the
runtime and clears the dl_throttled flag. There is a special case however:
if the throttling happened on sched-out and the task has been deboosted in
the meantime, the replenish is skipped as the task will return to its
normal scheduling class. This leaves the task with the dl_throttled flag
set.
Now if the task gets boosted up to the deadline scheduling class again
while it is sleeping, it's still in the throttled state. The normal wakeup
however will enqueue the task with ENQUEUE_REPLENISH not set, so we don't
actually place it on the rq. Thus we end up with a task that is runnable,
but not actually on the rq and neither a immediate replenishment happens,
nor is the replenishment timer set up, so the task is stuck in
forever-throttled limbo.
Clear the dl_throttled flag before dropping back to the normal scheduling
class to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200831110719.2126930-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Zlatan Radovanovic <zlatan.radovanovic@fet.ba>
Signed-off-by: Cyber Knight <cyberknight755@gmail.com>
The 25% default imbalance threshold for DIE and NUMA domain is large
enough to generate significant unfairness between threads. A typical
example is the case of 11 threads running on 2x4 CPUs. The imbalance of
20% between the 2 groups of 4 cores is just low enough to not trigger
the load balance between the 2 groups. We will have always the same 6
threads on one group of 4 CPUs and the other 5 threads on the other
group of CPUS. With a fair time sharing in each group, we ends up with
+20% running time for the group of 5 threads.
Consider decreasing the imbalance threshold for overloaded case where we
use the load to balance task and to ensure fair time sharing.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921072424.14813-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Zlatan Radovanovic <zlatan.radovanovic@fet.ba>
Signed-off-by: Cyber Knight <cyberknight755@gmail.com>
sched domains tend to trigger simultaneously the load balance loop but
the larger domains often need more time to collect statistics. This
slowness makes the larger domain trying to detach tasks from a rq whereas
tasks already migrated somewhere else at a sub-domain level. This is not
a real problem for idle LB because the period of smaller domains will
increase with its CPUs being busy and this will let time for higher ones
to pulled tasks. But this becomes a problem when all CPUs are already busy
because all domains stay synced when they trigger their LB.
A simple way to minimize simultaneous LB of all domains is to decrement the
the busy interval by 1 jiffies. Because of the busy_factor, the interval of
larger domain will not be a multiple of smaller ones anymore.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921072424.14813-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Zlatan Radovanovic <zlatan.radovanovic@fet.ba>
Signed-off-by: Cyber Knight <cyberknight755@gmail.com>
The busy_factor, which increases load balance interval when a cpu is busy,
is set to 32 by default. This value generates some huge LB interval on
large system like the THX2 made of 2 node x 28 cores x 4 threads.
For such system, the interval increases from 112ms to 3584ms at MC level.
And from 228ms to 7168ms at NUMA level.
Even on smaller system, a lower busy factor has shown improvement on the
fair distribution of the running time so let reduce it for all.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921072424.14813-5-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
[ Upstream commit 315c4f884800c45cb6bd8c90422fad554a8b9588 ]
Commit d81ae8aac85c ("sched/uclamp: Fix initialization of struct
uclamp_rq") introduced a bug where uclamp_max of the rq is not reset to
match the woken up task's uclamp_max when the rq is idle.
The code was relying on rq->uclamp_max initialized to zero, so on first
enqueue
static inline void uclamp_rq_inc_id(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
enum uclamp_id clamp_id)
{
...
if (uc_se->value > READ_ONCE(uc_rq->value))
WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, uc_se->value);
}
was actually resetting it. But since commit d81ae8aac85c changed the
default to 1024, this no longer works. And since rq->uclamp_flags is
also initialized to 0, neither above code path nor uclamp_idle_reset()
update the rq->uclamp_max on first wake up from idle.
This is only visible from first wake up(s) until the first dequeue to
idle after enabling the static key. And it only matters if the
uclamp_max of this task is < 1024 since only then its uclamp_max will be
effectively ignored.
Fix it by properly initializing rq->uclamp_flags = UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE to
ensure uclamp_idle_reset() is called which then will update the rq
uclamp_max value as expected.
Fixes: d81ae8aac85c ("sched/uclamp: Fix initialization of struct uclamp_rq")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211202112033.1705279-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
The UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE flag is set on a runqueue when dequeueing the last
uclamp active task (that is, when buckets.tasks reaches 0 for all
buckets) to maintain the last uclamp.max and prevent blocked util from
suddenly becoming visible.
However, there is an asymmetry in how the flag is set and cleared which
can lead to having the flag set whilst there are active tasks on the rq.
Specifically, the flag is cleared in the uclamp_rq_inc() path, which is
called at enqueue time, but set in uclamp_rq_dec_id() which is called
both when dequeueing a task _and_ in the update_uclamp_active() path. As
a result, when both uclamp_rq_{dec,ind}_id() are called from
update_uclamp_active(), the flag ends up being set but not cleared,
hence leaving the runqueue in a broken state.
Fix this by clearing the flag in update_uclamp_active() as well.
Fixes: e496187da710 ("sched/uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX")
Reported-by: Rick Yiu <rickyiu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210805102154.590709-2-qperret@google.com
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
There is currently nothing preventing tasks from changing their per-task
clamp values in anyway that they like. The rationale is probably that
system administrators are still able to limit those clamps thanks to the
cgroup interface. However, this causes pain in a system where both
per-task and per-cgroup clamp values are expected to be under the
control of core system components (as is the case for Android).
To fix this, let's require CAP_SYS_NICE to change per-task clamp values.
There are ongoing discussions upstream about more flexible approaches
than this using the RLIMIT API -- see [1]. But the upstream discussion
has not converged yet, and this is way too late for UAPI changes in
android12-5.10 anyway, so let's apply this change which provides the
behaviour we want without actually impacting UAPIs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210623123441.592348-4-qperret@google.com/
Bug: 187186685
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Change-Id: I749312a77306460318ac5374cf243d00b78120dd
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
[ Upstream commit 3e1493f46390618ea78607cb30c58fc19e2a5035 ]
When a task wakes up on an idle rq, uclamp_rq_util_with() would max
aggregate with rq value. But since there is no task enqueued yet, the
values are stale based on the last task that was running. When the new
task actually wakes up and enqueued, then the rq uclamp values should
reflect that of the newly woken up task effective uclamp values.
This is a problem particularly for uclamp_max because it default to
1024. If a task p with uclamp_max = 512 wakes up, then max aggregation
would ignore the capping that should apply when this task is enqueued,
which is wrong.
Fix that by ignoring max aggregation if the rq is idle since in that
case the effective uclamp value of the rq will be the ones of the task
that will wake up.
Fixes: 9d20ad7dfc9a ("sched/uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with()")
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
[qias: Changelog]
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630141204.8197-1-xuewen.yan94@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
[ Upstream commit 0213b7083e81f4acd69db32cb72eb4e5f220329a ]
Now cpu.uclamp.min acts as a protection, we need to make sure that the
uclamp request of the task is within the allowed range of the cgroup,
that is it is clamp()'ed correctly by tg->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] and
tg->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].
As reported by Xuewen [1] we can have some corner cases where there's
inversion between uclamp requested by task (p) and the uclamp values of
the taskgroup it's attached to (tg). Following table demonstrates
2 corner cases:
| p | tg | effective
-----------+-----+------+-----------
CASE 1
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | 60%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_max | 80% | 50% | 50%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
CASE 2
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_min | 0% | 30% | 30%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_max | 20% | 50% | 20%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
With this fix we get:
| p | tg | effective
-----------+-----+------+-----------
CASE 1
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | 50%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_max | 80% | 50% | 50%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
CASE 2
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_min | 0% | 30% | 30%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_max | 20% | 50% | 30%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
Additionally uclamp_update_active_tasks() must now unconditionally
update both UCLAMP_MIN/MAX because changing the tg's UCLAMP_MAX for
instance could have an impact on the effective UCLAMP_MIN of the tasks.
| p | tg | effective
-----------+-----+------+-----------
old
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | 50%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_max | 80% | 50% | 50%
-----------+-----+------+-----------
*new*
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_min | 60% | 0% | *60%*
-----------+-----+------+-----------
uclamp_max | 80% |*70%* | *70%*
-----------+-----+------+-----------
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAB8ipk_a6VFNjiEnHRHkUMBKbA+qzPQvhtNjJ_YNzQhqV_o8Zw@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 0c18f2ecfcc2 ("sched/uclamp: Fix wrong implementation of cpu.uclamp.min")
Reported-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210617165155.3774110-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
[ Upstream commit 0c18f2ecfcc274a4bcc1d122f79ebd4001c3b445 ]
cpu.uclamp.min is a protection as described in cgroup-v2 Resource
Distribution Model
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
which means we try our best to preserve the minimum performance point of
tasks in this group. See full description of cpu.uclamp.min in the
cgroup-v2.rst.
But the current implementation makes it a limit, which is not what was
intended.
For example:
tg->cpu.uclamp.min = 20%
p0->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 0
p1->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN] = 50%
Previous Behavior (limit):
p0->effective_uclamp = 0
p1->effective_uclamp = 20%
New Behavior (Protection):
p0->effective_uclamp = 20%
p1->effective_uclamp = 50%
Which is inline with how protections should work.
With this change the cgroup and per-task behaviors are the same, as
expected.
Additionally, we remove the confusing relationship between cgroup and
!user_defined flag.
We don't want for example RT tasks that are boosted by default to max to
change their boost value when they attach to a cgroup. If a cgroup wants
to limit the max performance point of tasks attached to it, then
cpu.uclamp.max must be set accordingly.
Or if they want to set different boost value based on cgroup, then
sysctl_sched_util_clamp_min_rt_default must be used to NOT boost to max
and set the right cpu.uclamp.min for each group to let the RT tasks
obtain the desired boost value when attached to that group.
As it stands the dependency on !user_defined flag adds an extra layer of
complexity that is not required now cpu.uclamp.min behaves properly as
a protection.
The propagation model of effective cpu.uclamp.min in child cgroups as
implemented by cpu_util_update_eff() is still correct. The parent
protection sets an upper limit of what the child cgroups will
effectively get.
Fixes: 3eac870a3247 (sched/uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-2-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
Util-clamp places tasks in different buckets based on their clamp values
for performance reasons. However, the size of buckets is currently
computed using a rounding division, which can lead to an off-by-one
error in some configurations.
For instance, with 20 buckets, the bucket size will be 1024/20=51. A
task with a clamp of 1024 will be mapped to bucket id 1024/51=20. Sadly,
correct indexes are in range [0,19], hence leading to an out of bound
memory access.
Clamp the bucket id to fix the issue.
Bug: 186415778
Fixes: 69842cba9ace ("sched/uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting")
Suggested-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210430151412.160913-1-qperret@google.com
Change-Id: Ibc28662de5554f80f97533b60e747f8a6e871c56
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
cpu_cgroup_css_online() calls cpu_util_update_eff() without holding the
uclamp_mutex or rcu_read_lock() like other call sites, which is
a mistake.
The uclamp_mutex is required to protect against concurrent reads and
writes that could update the cgroup hierarchy.
The rcu_read_lock() is required to traverse the cgroup data structures
in cpu_util_update_eff().
Surround the caller with the required locks and add some asserts to
better document the dependency in cpu_util_update_eff().
Fixes: 7226017ad37a ("sched/uclamp: Fix a bug in propagating uclamp value in new cgroups")
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510145032.1934078-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
When a new cgroup is created, the effective uclamp value wasn't updated
with a call to cpu_util_update_eff() that looks at the hierarchy and
update to the most restrictive values.
Fix it by ensuring to call cpu_util_update_eff() when a new cgroup
becomes online.
Without this change, the newly created cgroup uses the default
root_task_group uclamp values, which is 1024 for both uclamp_{min, max},
which will cause the rq to to be clamped to max, hence cause the
system to run at max frequency.
The problem was observed on Ubuntu server and was reproduced on Debian
and Buildroot rootfs.
By default, Ubuntu and Debian create a cpu controller cgroup hierarchy
and add all tasks to it - which creates enough noise to keep the rq
uclamp value at max most of the time. Imitating this behavior makes the
problem visible in Buildroot too which otherwise looks fine since it's a
minimal userspace.
Bug: 120440300
Fixes: 0b60ba2dd342 ("sched/uclamp: Propagate parent clamps")
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000701d5b965$361b6c60$a2524520$@net/
(cherry picked from commit 7226017ad37a888915628e59a84a2d1e57b40707
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I9636c60e04d58bbfc5041df1305b34a12b5a3f46
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Perczak <linux@andrzejperczak.com>
When SCHED_TUNE is disabled, certain elements in userspace, like
libperfmgr, may throw errors when it doesn't detect SCHEDTUNE-related nodes.
So, create a few dummy nodes to satisfy said userspace elements.
In case the user wants to stop controlling a uclamp constraint value
for a task, use the magic value -1 in sched_util_{min,max} with the
appropriate sched_flags (SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_{MIN,MAX}) to indicate
the reset.
The advantage over the 'additional flag' approach (i.e. introducing
SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_RESET) is that no additional flag has to be
exported via uapi. This avoids the need to document how this new flag
has be used in conjunction with the existing uclamp related flags.
The following subtle issue is fixed as well. When a uclamp constraint
value is set on a !user_defined uclamp_se it is currently first reset
and then set.
Fix this by AND'ing !user_defined with !SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP which
stands for the 'sched class change' case.
The related condition 'if (uc_se->user_defined)' moved from
__setscheduler_uclamp() into uclamp_reset().
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Yun Hsiang <hsiang023167@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113113454.25868-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
In commit:
sched/uclamp: Move all tunables to cpusets,
We directly modified and exported *_{read, write, show} functions
to cpuset code.This makes the resulting code quite inconsistent with
the upstream version.
We now use wrappers to reflect the original function, and to preserve
the code in accordance with upstream/mainline.
This is a purely cosmetic change, and no new behaviour should be
exhibited on applying this commit.
