bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call
[ Upstream commit eb86559a691cea5fa63e57a03ec3dc9c31e97955 ]
kmemleak reports this issue:
unreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):
comm "test_progs", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<0000000045f075f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0
[<0000000098b7c90a>] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230
[<00000000b4c3c403>] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700
[<00000000aa3875b7>] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0
[<000000001147357b>] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0
[<00000000b5a595b4>] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0
[<0000000011e391b1>] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940
[<0000000007f765c0>] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650
[<00000000839815d6>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0
[<00000000946ee250>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[<0000000000506b7f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is
not released in the abnormal scenario after "state->curframe--;". To
fix, move "state->curframe--;" to the very bottom of the function,
right when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii
suggested.
In addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In
the abnormal scenario before "state->curframe++;", the callee also
should be released by free_func_state().
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: fd978bf7fd ("bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1667884291-15666-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
25521fd2e2
commit
d494449782
@@ -5808,11 +5808,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
|
||||
/* Transfer references to the callee */
|
||||
err = copy_reference_state(callee, caller);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
goto err_out;
|
||||
|
||||
err = set_callee_state_cb(env, caller, callee, *insn_idx);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
goto err_out;
|
||||
|
||||
clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5829,6 +5829,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
|
||||
print_verifier_state(env, callee);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
err_out:
|
||||
free_func_state(callee);
|
||||
state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL;
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
@@ -5966,8 +5971,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
state->curframe--;
|
||||
caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
|
||||
caller = state->frame[state->curframe - 1];
|
||||
if (callee->in_callback_fn) {
|
||||
/* enforce R0 return value range [0, 1]. */
|
||||
struct tnum range = tnum_range(0, 1);
|
||||
@@ -6006,7 +6010,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* clear everything in the callee */
|
||||
free_func_state(callee);
|
||||
state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL;
|
||||
state->frame[state->curframe--] = NULL;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user