[ Upstream commit 475244f5e06beeda7b557d9dde46a5f439bf3379 ]
Add a test case to ensure that released pointer registers will not be
leaked into the map.
Before fix:
./test_verifier 984
984/u reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg FAIL
Unexpected success to load!
verification time 67 usec
stack depth 4
processed 23 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 2
peak_states 2 mark_read 1
984/p reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK
Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
After fix:
./test_verifier 984
984/u reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK
984/p reference tracking: try to leak released ptr reg OK
Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Youlin Li <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221103093440.3161-2-liulin063@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 8f50f16ff39dd4e2d43d1548ca66925652f8aff7 upstream.
Add coverage to the verifier tests and tests for reading bpf_sock fields to
ensure that 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit loads from dst_port field are allowed
only at intended offsets and produce expected values.
While 16-bit and 8-bit access to dst_port field is straight-forward, 32-bit
wide loads need be allowed and produce a zero-padded 16-bit value for
backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 13c6a37d409db9abc9c0bfc6d0a2f07bf0fff60e upstream.
This test tries to pass a PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL to the release function,
which would trigger a out of bounds access without the fix in commit
45ce4b4f9009 ("bpf: Fix crash due to out of bounds access into reg2btf_ids.")
but after the fix, it should only index using base_type(reg->type),
which should be less than __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX, and also not permit any
type flags to be set for the reg->type.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220220023138.2224652-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e523102cb719cbad1673b6aa2a4d5c1fa6f13799 upstream.
Fix up unprivileged test case results for 'Dest pointer in r0' verifier tests
given they now need to reject R0 containing a pointer value, and add a couple
of new related ones with 32bit cmpxchg as well.
root@foo:~/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf# ./test_verifier
#0/u invalid and of negative number OK
#0/p invalid and of negative number OK
[...]
#1268/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1 OK
#1269/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 2 OK
#1270/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access OK
#1271/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 1 OK
#1272/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2 OK
Summary: 1900 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 180486b430f4e22cc00a478163d942804baae4b5 upstream.
Test whether unprivileged would be able to leak the spilled pointer either
by exporting the returned value from the atomic{32,64} operation or by reading
and exporting the value from the stack after the atomic operation took place.
Note that for unprivileged, the below atomic cmpxchg test case named "Dest
pointer in r0 - succeed" is failing. The reason is that in the dst memory
location (r10 -8) there is the spilled register r10:
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (bf) r0 = r10
1: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r0
2: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp
2: (b7) r1 = 0
3: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp
3: (db) r0 = atomic64_cmpxchg((u64 *)(r10 -8), r0, r1)
4: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
4: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 -8)
5: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
5: (b7) r0 = 0
6: R0_w=invP0 R1_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
6: (95) exit
However, allowing this case for unprivileged is a bit useless given an
update with a new pointer will fail anyway:
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (bf) r0 = r10
1: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r0
2: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp
2: (db) r0 = atomic64_cmpxchg((u64 *)(r10 -8), r0, r10)
R10 leaks addr into mem
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[only backport one test for 5.15.y - gregkh]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit b560b21f71eb4ef9dfc7c8ec1d0e4d7f9aa54b51 upstream.
This commit adds BPF verifier selftests that cover all corner cases by
packet boundary checks. Specifically, 8-byte packet reads are tested at
the beginning of data and at the beginning of data_meta, using all kinds
of boundary checks (all comparison operators: <, >, <=, >=; both
permutations of operands: data + length compared to end, end compared to
data + length). For each case there are three tests:
1. Length is just enough for an 8-byte read. Length is either 7 or 8,
depending on the comparison.
2. Length is increased by 1 - should still pass the verifier. These
cases are useful, because they failed before commit 2fa7d94afc1a
("bpf: Fix the off-by-two error in range markings").
3. Length is decreased by 1 - should be rejected by the verifier.
Some existing tests are just renamed to avoid duplication.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211207081521.41923-1-maximmi@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2fa7d94afc1afbb4d702760c058dc2d7ed30f226 upstream.
The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that
appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error,
arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts
from the verifier, for example (pseudocode):
// 1. Passes the verifier:
if (data + 8 > data_end)
return early
read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]
// 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass):
if (data + 7 >= data_end)
return early
read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]
The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong
direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code
starts failing in the verifier:
// 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1.
if (data + 8 >= data_end)
return early
read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]
The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into
off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests
written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however,
they should be accepted.
This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the
right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the
one that should actually fail.
Fixes: fb2a311a31 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns")
Fixes: b37242c773 ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b9979db8340154526d9ab38a1883d6f6ba9b6d47 ]
Before this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
After this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1))
While processing BPF_JLE the reg_set_min_max() would set true_reg->umax_value = 1
and call __reg_combine_64_into_32(true_reg).
Without the fix it would not pass the condition:
if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value))
since umin_value == 0 at this point.
Before commit 10bf4e8316 the umin was incorrectly ingored.
The commit 10bf4e8316 fixed the correctness issue, but pessimized
propagation of 64-bit min max into 32-bit min max and corresponding var_off.
Fixes: 10bf4e8316 ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit bounds")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Add several test cases for checking update_alu_sanitation_state() under
multiple paths:
# ./test_verifier
[...]
#1061/u map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs const OK
#1061/p map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs const OK
#1062/u map access: known scalar += value_ptr const vs unknown OK
#1062/p map access: known scalar += value_ptr const vs unknown OK
#1063/u map access: known scalar += value_ptr const vs const (ne) OK
#1063/p map access: known scalar += value_ptr const vs const (ne) OK
#1064/u map access: known scalar += value_ptr const vs const (eq) OK
#1064/p map access: known scalar += value_ptr const vs const (eq) OK
#1065/u map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs unknown (eq) OK
#1065/p map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs unknown (eq) OK
#1066/u map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs unknown (lt) OK
#1066/p map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs unknown (lt) OK
#1067/u map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs unknown (gt) OK
#1067/p map access: known scalar += value_ptr unknown vs unknown (gt) OK
[...]
Summary: 1762 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In almost all cases from test_verifier that have been changed in here, we've
had an unreachable path with a load from a register which has an invalid
address on purpose. This was basically to make sure that we never walk this
path and to have the verifier complain if it would otherwise. Change it to
match on the right error for unprivileged given we now test these paths
under speculative execution.
There's one case where we match on exact # of insns_processed. Due to the
extra path, this will of course mismatch on unprivileged. Thus, restrict the
test->insn_processed check to privileged-only.
In one other case, we result in a 'pointer comparison prohibited' error. This
is similarly due to verifying an 'invalid' branch where we end up with a value
pointer on one side of the comparison.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Given we don't need to simulate the speculative domain for registers with
immediates anymore since the verifier uses direct imm-based rewrites instead
of having to mask, we can also lift a few cases that were previously rejected.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similarly as b02709587e ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32-bit signed bounds
from 64-bit bounds."), we also need to fix the propagation of 32 bit
unsigned bounds from 64 bit counterparts. That is, really only set the
u32_{min,max}_value when /both/ {umin,umax}_value safely fit in 32 bit
space. For example, the register with a umin_value == 1 does /not/ imply
that u32_min_value is also equal to 1, since umax_value could be much
larger than 32 bit subregister can hold, and thus u32_min_value is in
the interval [0,1] instead.
Before fix, invalid tracking result of R2_w=inv1:
[...]
5: R0_w=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0
5: (35) if r2 >= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
7: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,umin_value=1) R10=fp0
7: (b6) if w2 <= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
9: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775807,smax_value=9223372032559808513,umin_value=1,umax_value=18446744069414584321,var_off=(0x1; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min_value=1,s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R10=fp0
9: (bc) w2 = w2
10: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv1 R10=fp0
[...]
After fix, correct tracking result of R2_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)):
[...]
5: R0_w=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0
5: (35) if r2 >= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
7: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,umin_value=1) R10=fp0
7: (b6) if w2 <= 0x1 goto pc+1
[...] // goto path
9: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372032559808513,umax_value=18446744069414584321,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000001),s32_min_value=0,s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R10=fp0
9: (bc) w2 = w2
10: R0=inv1337 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) R10=fp0
[...]
Thus, same issue as in b02709587e holds for unsigned subregister tracking.
Also, align __reg64_bound_u32() similarly to __reg64_bound_s32() as done in
b02709587e to make them uniform again.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Manfred Paul (@_manfp)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-04-23
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 69 non-merge commits during the last 22 day(s) which contain
a total of 69 files changed, 3141 insertions(+), 866 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add BPF static linker support for extern resolution of global, from Andrii.
2) Refine retval for bpf_get_task_stack helper, from Dave.
3) Add a bpf_snprintf helper, from Florent.
4) A bunch of miscellaneous improvements from many developers.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
- keep the ZC code, drop the code related to reinit
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
- fix build after move to net_generic
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Update various selftest error messages:
* The 'Rx tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types'
is reworked into more specific/differentiated error messages for better
guidance.
* The change into 'value -4294967168 makes map_value pointer be out of
bounds' is due to moving the mixed bounds check into the speculation
handling and thus occuring slightly later than above mentioned sanity
check.
* The change into 'math between map_value pointer and register with
unbounded min value' is similarly due to register sanity check coming
before the mixed bounds check.
* The case of 'map access: known scalar += value_ptr from different maps'
now loads fine given masks are the same from the different paths (despite
max map value size being different).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch adds support to BPF verifier to allow bpf program calling
kernel function directly.
The use case included in this set is to allow bpf-tcp-cc to directly
call some tcp-cc helper functions (e.g. "tcp_cong_avoid_ai()"). Those
functions have already been used by some kernel tcp-cc implementations.
This set will also allow the bpf-tcp-cc program to directly call the
kernel tcp-cc implementation, For example, a bpf_dctcp may only want to
implement its own dctcp_cwnd_event() and reuse other dctcp_*() directly
from the kernel tcp_dctcp.c instead of reimplementing (or
copy-and-pasting) them.
The tcp-cc kernel functions mentioned above will be white listed
for the struct_ops bpf-tcp-cc programs to use in a later patch.
The white listed functions are not bounded to a fixed ABI contract.
Those functions have already been used by the existing kernel tcp-cc.
If any of them has changed, both in-tree and out-of-tree kernel tcp-cc
implementations have to be changed. The same goes for the struct_ops
bpf-tcp-cc programs which have to be adjusted accordingly.
This patch is to make the required changes in the bpf verifier.
First change is in btf.c, it adds a case in "btf_check_func_arg_match()".
When the passed in "btf->kernel_btf == true", it means matching the
verifier regs' states with a kernel function. This will handle the
PTR_TO_BTF_ID reg. It also maps PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON, PTR_TO_SOCKET,
and PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK to its kernel's btf_id.
In the later libbpf patch, the insn calling a kernel function will
look like:
insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL)
insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL /* <- new in this patch */
insn->imm == func_btf_id /* btf_id of the running kernel */
[ For the future calling function-in-kernel-module support, an array
of module btf_fds can be passed at the load time and insn->off
can be used to index into this array. ]
At the early stage of verifier, the verifier will collect all kernel
function calls into "struct bpf_kfunc_desc". Those
descriptors are stored in "prog->aux->kfunc_tab" and will
be available to the JIT. Since this "add" operation is similar
to the current "add_subprog()" and looking for the same insn->code,
they are done together in the new "add_subprog_and_kfunc()".
In the "do_check()" stage, the new "check_kfunc_call()" is added
to verify the kernel function call instruction:
1. Ensure the kernel function can be used by a particular BPF_PROG_TYPE.
A new bpf_verifier_ops "check_kfunc_call" is added to do that.
The bpf-tcp-cc struct_ops program will implement this function in
a later patch.
2. Call "btf_check_kfunc_args_match()" to ensure the regs can be
used as the args of a kernel function.
3. Mark the regs' type, subreg_def, and zext_dst.
At the later do_misc_fixups() stage, the new fixup_kfunc_call()
will replace the insn->imm with the function address (relative
to __bpf_call_base). If needed, the jit can find the btf_func_model
by calling the new bpf_jit_find_kfunc_model(prog, insn).
With the imm set to the function address, "bpftool prog dump xlated"
will be able to display the kernel function calls the same way as
it displays other bpf helper calls.
gpl_compatible program is required to call kernel function.
This feature currently requires JIT.
The verifier selftests are adjusted because of the changes in
the verbose log in add_subprog_and_kfunc().
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210325015142.1544736-1-kafai@fb.com
Fix up test_verifier error messages for the case where the original error
message changed, or for the case where pointer alu errors differ between
privileged and unprivileged tests. Also, add alternative tests for keeping
coverage of the original verifier rejection error message (fp alu), and
newly reject map_ptr += rX where rX == 0 given we now forbid alu on these
types for unprivileged. All test_verifier cases pass after the change. The
test case fixups were kept separate to ease backporting of core changes.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-03-09
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 90 non-merge commits during the last 17 day(s) which contain
a total of 114 files changed, 5158 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Faster bpf_redirect_map(), from Björn.
2) skmsg cleanup, from Cong.
3) Support for floating point types in BTF, from Ilya.
4) Documentation for sys_bpf commands, from Joe.
5) Support for sk_lookup in bpf_prog_test_run, form Lorenz.
6) Enable task local storage for tracing programs, from Song.
7) bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper, from Yonghong.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't
play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte
input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting
bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case
for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here
doesn't reduce coverage.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-6-lmb@cloudflare.com
As pointed out by Ilya and explained in the new comment, there's a
discrepancy between x86 and BPF CMPXCHG semantics: BPF always loads
the value from memory into r0, while x86 only does so when r0 and the
value in memory are different. The same issue affects s390.
At first this might sound like pure semantics, but it makes a real
difference when the comparison is 32-bit, since the load will
zero-extend r0/rax.
The fix is to explicitly zero-extend rax after doing such a
CMPXCHG. Since this problem affects multiple archs, this is done in
the verifier by patching in a BPF_ZEXT_REG instruction after every
32-bit cmpxchg. Any archs that don't need such manual zero-extension
can do a look-ahead with insn_is_zext to skip the unnecessary mov.
Note this still goes on top of Ilya's patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210301154019.129110-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/T/#u
Differences v5->v6[1]:
- Moved is_cmpxchg_insn and ensured it can be safely re-used. Also renamed it
and removed 'inline' to match the style of the is_*_function helpers.
- Fixed up comments in verifier test (thanks for the careful review, Martin!)
Differences v4->v5[1]:
- Moved the logic entirely into opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32, thanks to Martin
for suggesting this.
Differences v3->v4[1]:
- Moved the optimization against pointless zext into the correct place:
opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32 is called _after_ fixup_bpf_calls.
Differences v2->v3[1]:
- Moved patching into fixup_bpf_calls (patch incoming to rename this function)
- Added extra commentary on bpf_jit_needs_zext
- Added check to avoid adding a pointless zext(r0) if there's already one there.
Difference v1->v2[1]: Now solved centrally in the verifier instead of
specifically for the x86 JIT. Thanks to Ilya and Daniel for the suggestions!
[1] v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+i-1C3ytZz6FjcPmUg5s4L51pMQDxWcZNvM86w4RHZ_o2khwg@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+i-1C3ytZz6FjcPmUg5s4L51pMQDxWcZNvM86w4RHZ_o2khwg@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/08669818-c99d-0d30-e1db-53160c063611@iogearbox.net/T/#t
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/08669818-c99d-0d30-e1db-53160c063611@iogearbox.net/T/#t
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d7ebaefb-bfd6-a441-3ff2-2fdfe699b1d2@iogearbox.net/T/#t
Reported-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 5ffa25502b ("bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The verifier test labelled "valid read map access into a read-only array
2" calls the bpf_csum_diff() helper and checks its return value. However,
architecture implementations of csum_partial() (which is what the helper
uses) differ in whether they fold the return value to 16 bit or not. For
example, x86 version has ...
if (unlikely(odd)) {
result = from32to16(result);
result = ((result >> 8) & 0xff) | ((result & 0xff) << 8);
}
... while generic lib/checksum.c does:
result = from32to16(result);
if (odd)
result = ((result >> 8) & 0xff) | ((result & 0xff) << 8);
This makes the helper return different values on different architectures,
breaking the test on non-x86. To fix this, add an additional instruction
to always mask the return value to 16 bits, and update the expected return
value accordingly.
Fixes: fb2abb73e5 ("bpf, selftest: test {rd, wr}only flags and direct value access")
Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210228103017.320240-1-yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com
This code generates a CMPXCHG loop in order to implement atomic_fetch
bitwise operations. Because CMPXCHG is hard-coded to use rax (which
holds the BPF r0 value), it saves the _real_ r0 value into the
internal "ax" temporary register and restores it once the loop is
complete.
In the middle of the loop, the actual bitwise operation is performed
using src_reg. The bug occurs when src_reg is r0: as described above,
r0 has been clobbered and the real r0 value is in the ax register.
Therefore, perform this operation on the ax register instead, when
src_reg is r0.
Fixes: 981f94c3e9 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210216125307.1406237-1-jackmanb@google.com
Atomic tests store a DW, but then load it back as a W from the same
address. This doesn't work on big-endian systems, and since the point
of those tests is not testing narrow loads, fix simply by loading a
DW.
Fixes: 98d666d05a ("bpf: Add tests for new BPF atomic operations")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210020713.77911-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
When BPF_FETCH is set, atomic instructions load a value from memory
into a register. The current verifier code first checks via
check_mem_access whether we can access the memory, and then checks
via check_reg_arg whether we can write into the register.
For loads, check_reg_arg has the side-effect of marking the
register's value as unkonwn, and check_mem_access has the side effect
of propagating bounds from memory to the register. This currently only
takes effect for stack memory.
Therefore with the current order, bounds information is thrown away,
but by simply reversing the order of check_reg_arg
vs. check_mem_access, we can instead propagate bounds smartly.
A simple test is added with an infinite loop that can only be proved
unreachable if this propagation is present. This is implemented both
with C and directly in test_verifier using assembly.
Suggested-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210202135002.4024825-1-jackmanb@google.com
There are 3 tests added into verifier's jit tests to trigger x64
jit jump padding.
The first test can be represented as the following assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+128
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+128
...
129: if r0 == 128 goto pc+128
130: goto pc+128
131: goto pc+127
...
256: goto pc+2
257: goto pc+1
258: r0 = 1
259: ret
We first store a random number to r0 and add the corresponding
conditional jumps (2~129) to make verifier believe that those jump
instructions from 130 to 257 are reachable. When the program is sent to
x64 jit, it starts to optimize out the NOP jumps backwards from 257.
Since there are 128 such jumps, the program easily reaches 15 passes and
triggers jump padding.
Here is the x64 jit code of the first test:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 4c 90 75 e3 call 0xffffffffe375905c
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 fe 04 00 00 je 0x518
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 f9 04 00 00 je 0x51d
...
f6: 48 83 f8 18 cmp rax,0x18
fa: 0f 84 8b 04 00 00 je 0x58b
100: 48 83 f8 19 cmp rax,0x19
104: 0f 84 86 04 00 00 je 0x590
10a: 48 83 f8 1a cmp rax,0x1a
10e: 0f 84 81 04 00 00 je 0x595
...
500: 0f 84 83 01 00 00 je 0x689
506: 48 81 f8 80 00 00 00 cmp rax,0x80
50d: 0f 84 76 01 00 00 je 0x689
513: e9 71 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
518: e9 6c 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
...
5fe: e9 86 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
603: e9 81 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
608: 0f 1f 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax]
60b: eb 7c jmp 0x689
60d: eb 7a jmp 0x689
...
683: eb 04 jmp 0x689
685: eb 02 jmp 0x689
687: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
689: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
68e: c9 leave
68f: c3 ret
As expected, a 3 bytes NOPs is inserted at 608 due to the transition
from imm32 jmp to imm8 jmp. A 2 bytes NOPs is also inserted at 687 to
replace a NOP jump.
The second test case is tricky. Here is the assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+2048
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+2048
...
2049: if r0 == 2048 goto pc+2048
2050: goto pc+2048
2051: goto pc+16
2052: goto pc+15
...
2064: goto pc+3
2065: goto pc+2
2066: goto pc+1
...
[repeat "goto pc+16".."goto pc+1" 127 times]
...
4099: r0 = 2
4100: ret
There are 4 major parts of the program.
1) 1~2049: Those are instructions to make 2050~4098 reachable. Some of
them also could generate the padding for jmp_cond.
2) 2050: This is the target instruction for the imm32 nop jmp padding.
3) 2051~4098: The repeated "goto 1~16" instructions are designed to be
consumed by the nop jmp optimization. In the end, those
instrucitons become 128 continuous 0 offset jmp and are
optimized out in 1 pass, and this make insn 2050 an imm32
nop jmp in the next pass, so that we can trigger the
5 bytes padding.
4) 4099~4100: Those are the instructions to end the program.
The x64 jit code is like this:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 bc 7b d5 d3 call 0xffffffffd3d57bcc
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 7e 66 00 00 je 0x6698
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 74 66 00 00 je 0x6698
24: 48 83 f8 03 cmp rax,0x3
28: 0f 84 6a 66 00 00 je 0x6698
2e: 48 83 f8 04 cmp rax,0x4
32: 0f 84 60 66 00 00 je 0x6698
38: 48 83 f8 05 cmp rax,0x5
3c: 0f 84 56 66 00 00 je 0x6698
42: 48 83 f8 06 cmp rax,0x6
46: 0f 84 4c 66 00 00 je 0x6698
...
666c: 48 81 f8 fe 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7fe
6673: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6677: 74 1f je 0x6698
6679: 48 81 f8 ff 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7ff
6680: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6684: 74 12 je 0x6698
6686: 48 81 f8 00 08 00 00 cmp rax,0x800
668d: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6691: 74 05 je 0x6698
6693: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
6698: b8 02 00 00 00 mov eax,0x2
669d: c9 leave
669e: c3 ret
Since insn 2051~4098 are optimized out right before the padding pass,
there are several conditional jumps from the first part are replaced with
imm8 jmp_cond, and this triggers the 4 bytes padding, for example at
6673, 6680, and 668d. On the other hand, Insn 2050 is replaced with the
5 bytes nops at 6693.
The third test is to invoke the first and second tests as subprogs to test
bpf2bpf. Per the system log, there was one more jit happened with only
one pass and the same jit code was produced.
v4:
- Add the second test case which triggers jmp_cond padding and imm32 nop
jmp padding.
- Add the new test case as another subprog
Signed-off-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119102501.511-4-glin@suse.com
Conflicts:
drivers/net/can/dev.c
commit 03f16c5075 ("can: dev: can_restart: fix use after free bug")
commit 3e77f70e73 ("can: dev: move driver related infrastructure into separate subdir")
Code move.
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
commit 8e4052c32d ("net: dsa: b53: fix an off by one in checking "vlan->vid"")
commit b7a9e0da2d ("net: switchdev: remove vid_begin -> vid_end range from VLAN objects")
Field rename.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The prog_test that's added depends on Clang/LLVM features added by
Yonghong in commit 286daafd6512 (was https://reviews.llvm.org/D72184).
Note the use of a define called ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS: this is used
to:
- Avoid breaking the build for people on old versions of Clang
- Avoid needing separate lists of test objects for no_alu32, where
atomics are not supported even if Clang has the feature.
The atomics_test.o BPF object is built unconditionally both for
test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32. For test_progs, if Clang supports
atomics, ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS is defined, so it includes the proper
test code. Otherwise, progs and global vars are defined anyway, as
stubs; this means that the skeleton user code still builds.
The atomics_test.o userspace object is built once and used for both
test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32. A variable called skip_tests is
defined in the BPF object's data section, which tells the userspace
object whether to skip the atomics test.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-11-jackmanb@google.com
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new
operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with
the immediate discriminating different operations.
In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start
calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD.
This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the
immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero.
All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is
kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel
headers.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back
in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.
The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.
Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113053810.13518-2-gilad.reti@gmail.com
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2020-12-14
1) Expose bpf_sk_storage_*() helpers to iterator programs, from Florent Revest.
2) Add AF_XDP selftests based on veth devs to BPF selftests, from Weqaar Janjua.
3) Support for finding BTF based kernel attach targets through libbpf's
bpf_program__set_attach_target() API, from Andrii Nakryiko.
4) Permit pointers on stack for helper calls in the verifier, from Yonghong Song.
5) Fix overflows in hash map elem size after rlimit removal, from Eric Dumazet.
6) Get rid of direct invocation of llc in BPF selftests, from Andrew Delgadillo.
7) Fix xsk_recvmsg() to reorder socket state check before access, from Björn Töpel.
8) Add new libbpf API helper to retrieve ring buffer epoll fd, from Brendan Jackman.
9) Batch of minor BPF selftest improvements all over the place, from Florian Lehner,
KP Singh, Jiri Olsa and various others.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (31 commits)
selftests/bpf: Add a test for ptr_to_map_value on stack for helper access
bpf: Permits pointers on stack for helper calls
libbpf: Expose libbpf ring_buffer epoll_fd
selftests/bpf: Add set_attach_target() API selftest for module target
libbpf: Support modules in bpf_program__set_attach_target() API
selftests/bpf: Silence ima_setup.sh when not running in verbose mode.
selftests/bpf: Drop the need for LLVM's llc
selftests/bpf: fix bpf_testmod.ko recompilation logic
samples/bpf: Fix possible hang in xdpsock with multiple threads
selftests/bpf: Make selftest compilation work on clang 11
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - adding xdpxceiver to .gitignore
selftests/bpf: Drop tcp-{client,server}.py from Makefile
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - Bi-directional Sockets - SKB, DRV
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - Socket Teardown - SKB, DRV
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - DRV POLL, NOPOLL
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - SKB POLL, NOPOLL
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests framework
bpf: Only provide bpf_sock_from_file with CONFIG_NET
bpf: Return -ENOTSUPP when attaching to non-kernel BTF
xsk: Validate socket state in xsk_recvmsg, prior touching socket members
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201214214316.20642-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
xdp_return_frame_bulk() needs to pass a xdp_buff
to __xdp_return().
strlcpy got converted to strscpy but here it makes no
functional difference, so just keep the right code.
Conflicts:
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The test fails because of a recent fix to the verifier, even though this
program is valid. In details what happens is:
7: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)
Load a 32-bit value, with signed bounds [S32_MIN, S32_MAX]. The bounds
of the 64-bit value are [0, U32_MAX]...
8: (65) if r1 s> 0xffffffff goto pc+1
... therefore this is always true (the operand is sign-extended).
10: (b4) w2 = 11
11: (6d) if r2 s> r1 goto pc+1
When true, the 64-bit bounds become [0, 10]. The 32-bit bounds are still
[S32_MIN, 10].
13: (64) w1 <<= 2
Because this is a 32-bit operation, the verifier propagates the new
32-bit bounds to the 64-bit ones, and the knowledge gained from insn 11
is lost.
14: (0f) r0 += r1
15: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 4
Then the verifier considers r0 unbounded here, rejecting the test. To
make the test work, change insn 8 to check the sign of the 32-bit value.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
After a 32-bit load followed by a branch, the verifier would reduce the
maximum bound of the register to 0x7fffffff, allowing a user to bypass
bound checks. Ensure such a program is rejected.
In the second test, the 64-bit compare should not sufficient to
determine whether the signed 32-bit lower bound is 0, so the verifier
should reject the second branch.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch tests:
int bpf_cls(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
/* REG_6: sk
* REG_7: tp
* REG_8: req_sk
*/
sk = skb->sk;
if (!sk)
return 0;
tp = bpf_skc_to_tcp_sock(sk);
req_sk = bpf_skc_to_tcp_request_sock(sk);
if (!req_sk)
return 0;
/* !tp has not been tested, so verifier should reject. */
return *(__u8 *)tp;
}
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201019194219.1051314-1-kafai@fb.com
The 64-bit JEQ/JNE handling in reg_set_min_max() was clearing reg->id in either
true or false branch. In the case 'if (reg->id)' check was done on the other
branch the counter part register would have reg->id == 0 when called into
find_equal_scalars(). In such case the helper would incorrectly identify other
registers with id == 0 as equivalent and propagate the state incorrectly.
Fix it by preserving ID across reg_set_min_max().
In other words any kind of comparison operator on the scalar register
should preserve its ID to recognize:
r1 = r2
if (r1 == 20) {
#1 here both r1 and r2 == 20
} else if (r2 < 20) {
#2 here both r1 and r2 < 20
}
The patch is addressing #1 case. The #2 was working correctly already.
Fixes: 75748837b7 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201014175608.1416-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
The llvm register allocator may use two different registers representing the
same virtual register. In such case the following pattern can be observed:
1047: (bf) r9 = r6
1048: (a5) if r6 < 0x1000 goto pc+1
1050: ...
1051: (a5) if r9 < 0x2 goto pc+66
1052: ...
1053: (bf) r2 = r9 /* r2 needs to have upper and lower bounds */
This is normal behavior of greedy register allocator.
The slides 137+ explain why regalloc introduces such register copy:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/slides/Yatsina-LLVM%20Greedy%20Register%20Allocator.pdf
There is no way to tell llvm 'not to do this'.
Hence the verifier has to recognize such patterns.
In order to track this information without backtracking allocate ID
for scalars in a similar way as it's done for find_good_pkt_pointers().
When the verifier encounters r9 = r6 assignment it will assign the same ID
to both registers. Later if either register range is narrowed via conditional
jump propagate the register state into the other register.
Clear register ID in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() for any alu instruction. The
register ID is ignored for scalars in regsafe() and doesn't affect state
pruning. mark_reg_unknown() clears the ID. It's used to process call, endian
and other instructions. Hence ID is explicitly cleared only in
adjust_reg_min_max_vals() and in 32-bit mov.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Commit 4976b718c3 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") switched
the order of check_subprogs() and resolve_pseudo_ldimm() in
the verifier. Now an empty prog expects to see the error "last
insn is not an the prog of a single invalid ldimm exit or jmp"
instead, because the check for subprogs comes first. It's now
pointless to validate that half of ldimm64 won't be the last
instruction.
Tested:
# ./test_verifier
Summary: 1129 PASSED, 537 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
and the full set of bpf selftests.
Fixes: 4976b718c3 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201007022857.2791884-1-haoluo@google.com
If we AND two values together that are known in the 32bit subregs, but not
known in the 64bit registers we rely on the tnum value to report the 32bit
subreg is known. And do not use mark_reg_known() directly from
scalar32_min_max_and()
Add an AND test to cover the case with known 32bit subreg, but unknown
64bit reg.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
LD_[ABS|IND] instructions may return from the function early. bpf_tail_call
pseudo instruction is either fallthrough or return. Allow them in the
subprograms only when subprograms are BTF annotated and have scalar return
types. Allow ld_abs and tail_call in the main program even if it calls into
subprograms. In the past that was not ok to do for ld_abs, since it was JITed
with special exit sequence. Since bpf_gen_ld_abs() was introduced the ld_abs
looks like normal exit insn from JIT point of view, so it's safe to allow them
in the main program.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
