Jiri Olsa bb05b6a94e UPSTREAM: bpf: Remove bpf_image tree ...

Now that we have all the objects (bpf_prog, bpf_trampoline,
bpf_dispatcher) linked in bpf_tree, there's no need to have
separate bpf_image tree for images.

Reverting the bpf_image tree together with struct bpf_image,
because it's no longer needed.

Also removing bpf_image_alloc function and adding the original
bpf_jit_alloc_exec_page interface instead.

The kernel_text_address function can now rely only on is_bpf_text_address,
because it checks the bpf_tree that contains all the objects.

Keeping bpf_image_ksym_add and bpf_image_ksym_del because they are
useful wrappers with perf's ksymbol interface calls.

Change-Id: I9ae6c242efaf78be2a32bb0162f4fc32defab441
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-13-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

2025-09-08 17:25:23 +03:00

4.9 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw